0 Comments
White vinyl railings with white Washington-style square balusters offer a classic look, and two 6′ wide steps lead down to the yard. A seam board was designed to avoid joints in the deck. Pebble Grey is a light heather grey with an easy-to-maintain, wood-like grain pattern, making it the simple choice for customers looking for an elegant outdoor space that will last for years to come. We then replaced the bare space with 522 sq. To make the transformation complete, we first demoed and hauled away the existing deck. : FastenMaster Cortex 2-1/2' Fastening System for Trex Decking - 100 Linear Feet - Trex Select Pebble Grey : Industrial & Scientific 6873 FREE delivery June 29 - 30. Trex Transcend Composite Decking Board Build and Buy Compare Custom Options. Plus, its quality low-maintenance material makes it easy to clean with just soap and water! TREX SELECT Composite Decking Able to withstand high traffic Natural wood-grain finish Fade, stain, scratch, and mold resistant Easy maintenance Available in 5 Premium Earth Tone Colors: Pebble Grey, Winchester grey, Saddle, Woodland Brown, and Madeira. Select Composite Grooved Decking Board Pebble Grey - 1 In. Composite decking is resistant to warping, rotting, staining, or fading. Durable TREX decking is ready whenever you want to use it.One of more popular composite deck color options is this week’s feature for “Makeover Monday”Īndrew Vidulich, one of Fence & Deck Connection’s experienced Sales Consultants worked with our Maryland clients to transform their warped wood deck into a larger space that requires far less maintenance. Overview Pebble grey is a light heather grey with an easy-to-maintain, wood-like grain pattern, making it the simple choice. Say good-bye to sanding, staining, and painting. It resists fading and scratching and eliminates the time-consuming maintenance of wood. High-performance TREX decking is engineered to last. Use HIDEAWAY hidden fasteners to install the grooved (main) decking. And the manufacturing of composite decking board doesn’t require lumber, so TREX decking has never contributed to deforestation – not a single tree. TREX Deck boards are available in solid & grooved edge profiles. This diverts 400 million pounds of plastic and wood scrap from landfills every year. TREX decking is literally built on green principles and values, with products made from 95% recycled materials. TREX decking offers two incredible benefits that have made this brand an industry leader: sustainability and durability. But beauty isn’t the only reason you can feel great about your TREX deck. Take your imagination to new heights – with innovative composite deck board solutions.Įvery detail of TREX decking is designed for beautiful outdoor living. 1 x 8 x 12 SELECT COLORS: Pebble Grey, Winchester Grey, Saddle, Woodland Brown. For the term set forth below, Trex Company, Inc. TREX decking brings your outdoor ideas to life. deck and outdoor space with these Transcend (R) fascia boards by Trex (R). However, I'd argue that having your entire project in a black-box system is not something you should feel comfortable with. As far as I know, Unity Collaborate actually runs on a Git-LFS backend, which makes it quite similar to GitCentral, but for Unity. Unity Teams is also a black-box, and it seems that you can't access your repository in any other way than through the Unity Editor itself. When compared to those, it also seems to lack in other features, such as project management tools, documentation tools, and so on. I haven't used Unity Teams myself, but it does seem quite similar to any of the cloud-hosting providers we already evaluated for Git. The pricing is also very reasonable, especially considering there are 25GB of storage included. This seems to be a managed platform and service to host your project, run your continuous integration and automation. Unity Collaborate is an official Unity product and part of their Unity Teams offering. If you're using Unity for your game project, you may have heard of Unity Collaborate. I have, however, heard of some game projects using Mercurial, and would be very interested to hear some testimonies. With Bitbucket shutting down support for Mercurial repositories, and now GitHub private repositories being free, more and more projects are looking to migrate from Mercurial to Git, as indicated even by some projects still listed on Mercurial's page.įor games, it seems that this is a poor option due to the lack of large file support, and the typical downsides of DVCS for non-mergeable files. However, it is undeniable that Git has won the popularity contest. The Wikipedia page lists Facebook as one of the major users of Mercurial, and it is the common example thrown around when discussing Mercurial's adoption in the real world. Mercurial is still very active and used today in open-source projects as well as large companies. Mercurial seems to provide a solution for handling large binary files, and is considering a Git-LFS-compatible protocol. For a full breakdown, these two articles from Atlassian summarize very well why one would be better than the other.Īs with most DVCS, it requires a local copy of the history and therefore the same problems than we would have with Git would also apply. There are other aspects that differentiate the two, most notably, while Git allows rewriting history through rebasing and several other commands, Mercurial's history is more immutable. In particular, Mercurial's command-line seems to be elegant and straightforward, using similar terms as subversion which makes learning Mercurial much easier than Git. Proponents of Mercurial argue that it is much better designed, and I generally tend to agree. This has caused sort of an internet feud over which system is superior, with each side trying to convince the other to no avail. Mercurial's data model, features, and functionalities are virtually identical to Git. It is written in Python and is an open-source project as well. Mercurial is a Distributed Version Control System (DVCS for short) very similar to Git. That being said, there are other options we'll try to cover briefly. Perforce seems to be the most commonly integrated source control among game engines, especially the proprietary ones that you're unlikely to get your hands on unless you're part of the company. Why do I see those as being the most popular? Well, one indicator is that these are the 4 options included by default in Unreal Engine 4, for instance. Subversion (SVN), a very solid option for small to medium projects, free and open-source.Much better than SVN, but comes with a price tag. PlasticSCM, a very promising competitor to Perforce.Perforce, the game industry standard, very expensive but the best option for dealing with large and complex projects.Git, very popular outside of Games, but its regular downsides become showstoppers for game development at scale.So far we've been studying in-depth 4 of the most popular source control options for game development. So, for the final article in this series, and perhaps the only one you should read, I'll try to provide an overview of our findings and provide simple guidelines to help you with your choice. Perhaps you'll sign a big publishing deal and need to scale rapidly with a larger budget, in which case your choices are changed once again. If you're a small team or an indie developer, you do not know what the future holds. Each solution has its pros and cons, many different pricing and hosting options. If you have followed through all of the articles, the answer to your questions may still be unclear. We have finally reached the end of this series trying to find the best source control for game development. This is part of a series of posts on source control for game development. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |